@MiningAtoms

Share this post

Used Nuclear Fuel is Fuel, Not Waste

bfrandall.substack.com

Discover more from @MiningAtoms

Energy. Mining. Life.
Over 3,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Used Nuclear Fuel is Fuel, Not Waste

Labels Are Important

B.F. Randall ⚛ ⛏ ⚡
Jan 17, 2023
21
Share this post

Used Nuclear Fuel is Fuel, Not Waste

bfrandall.substack.com
2
Share

Dr. James Conca has persuaded me to reject the “waste” label.
✅Used Nuclear Fuel
🚫Spent Nuclear Fuel
🚫High Level Waste
Part 1:

Used Nuclear Fuel, part 2 (5% is not very used - these uranium fuel pellets are fuel).

Used Nuclear Fuel, Part 3
Solid. Heavy. Self-Contained. No possible release. No possible exposure pathway. Inherently safe.

It's a million times easier to measure radiation than to measure elements or chemicals based on laboratory testing. That makes radiation seem scary but it's not. It takes far more radiation exposure than I imagined to cause harm.

The Two Lies that Killed Nuclear PowerWe have been fed two lies about nuclear electricity by the nuclear power establishment. The Teeny Weeny Lie The probability of a sizable release of radioactive material from a nuclear power plant is s…https://open.substack.com/pub/jackdevanney/p/the-two-lies-that-killed-nuclear?r=1rapbo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Future Fuel - Uranium is Abundant

Used Nuclear Fuel is not waste. It still has over 90% fissile-fissionable thermal value. Our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will use it up and be grateful that we saved them the trouble of mining more uranium.

Twitter avatar for @alan_k63
Real Dr Alan K 🍞🥛👌☕🇦🇺 @alan_k63
@MarkMywords1919 @Mining_Atoms I wouldnt worry about the waste, they'll invent something in the future and use it as a fuel
Image
8:49 AM ∙ Jan 17, 2023

The biggest problem with used fuel is economic. New uranium is so abundant that it costs more to reprocess used fuel than to make new fuel pellets from uranium. This is actually a good problem. Uranium fuel is abundant. The more we look, the more we find. Thorium is even more abundant. Eventually, we will figure out the economics of re-burning spent fuel. Until then, safely storing metallic, solid, stable fuel pellets causes no harm.

The regulatory and financial programs around the storage of used nuclear fuel are robust and effective. People are prone to overlook regulatory programs. Here is some more context foe what Dr. Conca is explaining in these three videos.

@MiningAtoms
What is it with the Yellow "Radioactive Waste" Barrels?
Recently, @malacodeed (aerospace engineer based in Denmark) asked me to post a thread covering the risks posed by radioactive wastes in the context of chemical wastes and such…
Read more
9 months ago · 10 likes · 4 comments · B.F. Randall ⚛ ⛏ ⚡

21
Share this post

Used Nuclear Fuel is Fuel, Not Waste

bfrandall.substack.com
2
Share
2 Comments
Share this discussion

Used Nuclear Fuel is Fuel, Not Waste

bfrandall.substack.com
environMENTAL
Writes environMENTAL
Jan 17·edited Jan 17

We like to say we can engineer our way to safely and effectively manage risk associated with partially-used nuclear fuel. We’ve proven that for decades.

But there is no engineering fix to wind/solar intermittency. And no, building 3-4 times the necessary capacity for spinning green crucifixes and sun catchers and battery storage to account for capacity factors isn’t a “fix” for that problem.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
1 reply
1 more comment...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 B.F. Randall ⚛ ⛏ ⚡
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing